|
COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT COMPOSTING
1) What is compost or composting?
Composting is, in the simplest terms, the biological reduction
of organic wastes into humus. It is a natural process used by
nature to return nutrients contained in organic materials that
were once alive, to the soil. Compost is composed of complex
carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, peptides, humic acids,
fulmic acids, enzymes and beneficial micro-organisms. Whether
composting takes place in a compost pile or on a forest floor,
it is the same clean, sweet, earthy smelling material that is
so essential for healthy plant growth.
2) Is composting a new process?
No! References to using manure and wheat straw in composting
was common in biblical times. In fact, the Greek and Hebrew
words for compost piles were originally translated "dung
piles". Recent archeological discovers clarify that the
dung piles referred to in the Bible were indeed compost piles.
References to composting have been found on clay tablets dated
1,000 years before Moses was born. Arab writings of the tenth
and twelfth centuries have extensive writings on how to compost
and its importance to agriculture. Nature was making compost
eons before man ever walked on earth. The first recorded commercial
composting operation for municipal refuse was started in Holland
in 1932 and is still in operation today. In 1971 the EPA estimated
that there were over 2,600 composting operations in the world
outside of the United States. The EPA estimates that there are
over 10,000 composting operations in the United States of all
sizes.
3) How is compost produced?
Compost is produced by the breakdown and conversion of materials
such as grass and tree trimmings, food waste, scrap paper, cardboard,
manures, scrap wood, liquids, bio-solids and others, that are
composed of organic compounds from materials that were once
alive. These materials are passed through a grinder, moisture
and micro-organisms added and then placed in some form of pile
to undergo an accelerated and controlled decomposition process.
4) How does this decomposition take place?
The decomposition takes place by the micro-organisms (bacteria,
fungi, etc.) literally eating this material and converting it
back into simpler and different chemical compounds. These micro-organisms
take oxygen (and some nitrogen) from the air and combine it
with carbon from the raw material and water to produce compost,
CO2, steam and heat. The exact decomposition involves the chemical
and physical processes of oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis and
thermodynamics.
5) Is composting a recycling process, and if so, does it count
towards meeting the federal and state recycling laws?
Yes! In this area of the country, between 30-35% of all material
going into landfills are grass and tree trimmings. If we add
food waste, paper, cardboard, lumber, bio-solids and other natural
materials then theoretically, 50-75% of our waste stream could
be recycled by composting.6) What do you mean by theoretically
50-75% could be composted?
For composting to be successful, a clean, environmentally safe
product must be produced that can be sold for use in the horticultural,
agricultural, and construction industries. To produce a clean
and safe compost, all one needs is clean and safe source material.
There are thousands of composting operations in this country
and one pattern has become very clear: composting operations
that use source separated materials (no contaminants) have been
very successful and operations that have used co-mingled collections
(with contaminants) have been tremendous failures often wasting
tens of millions of tax dollars if government owned and operated.
It is a matter of economics and practicality. Most grass and
tree trimmings are produced in a source separated manner, hence
it is very easy and inexpensive to collect them in a source
separated manner. Recent research has shown that much of our
food waste from restaurants and grocery stores can be economically
collected in a source separated manner and actually save the
store money on waste disposal fees in most cases.
The rest of the organic part of our waste stream comes from
items such as cardboard packaging in our homes such as cereal
boxes. This type of waste is typically tossed into the garbage
along with dead flashlight batteries, household cleaning agents,
empty pesticide bottles, along with plastics, metals, and glass
items. One Ni-Cad (Nickel-Cadmium) or Lead-acid flashlight battery
contains enough heavy metals alone, to contaminate a large amount
of compost, rendering it almost useless.
Even though the theoretical limit for composting materials in
the waste stream may be as high as 70%, the practical or economical
limit is about 40-45% of the total waste stream today.
7) Are there different types of compost?
Yes. Compost can vary widely in both nutrient content, disease
fighting ability, humus content, etc. These factors are determined
by the type of source materials, the mixture (ratios) of this
source material (chemistry), the temperature and structure of
the piles (physics), the time factor the pile stays at certain
temperatures (physics), and others. A knowledgeable scientist
can control the composting process to produce customized compost.
For example, one might increase the nitrogen content for use
as fertilizer or maximize the content of beneficial micro-organism
to use for disease control in greenhouse or nursery potting
soils. Like any other product, compost quality ranges from excellent
to very poor depending on the goals and knowledge of the operator.
The process of composting is approached from basically two points
of view. The first is waste volume reduction to avoid using
up valuable landfill space. The second is a manufacturing process
to produce a valuable end product for use in agriculture and
horticulture. The purpose or methods chosen for composting greatly
affects product quality, cost, and odors produced.
8) What are the two points of view and how do they differ?
The first point of view comes from waste management where the
goal is to reduce the volume of waste. Engineering techniques
are chosen (windrows, in-vessel, etc.) that cause the material's
volume to decrease. This is done by converting the solid particles
in the waste to gases (water vapor, odors, etc.) and releasing
them to the atmosphere. In general, these types of processes
offer fast volume reductions (less than 12 weeks start to finish)
and require very expensive special equipment. The product produced
often has less nutrients since many useful chemicals have been
released into the air to achieve the volume reduction.
The other point of view is to look at composting as a manufacturing
process where the goal is a useful and valuable end product.
Simple engineering is generally used (large static piles) that
are designed to prevent the loss of volume. Gases produced are
absorbed (eaten) by other microorganisms and converted back
to useful solids (nutrients). Longer time frames (6-36 months)
are required as these piles are left undisturbed for weeks at
a time (some operators go for 1 year or more) before turning.
There is less volume reduction and less gases produced, hence
very little potential for odors. Compost operators in Seattle,
Washington have gone years without a single odor complaint using
large pile technology even with residential subdivisions located
within a few hundred feet distance. These operators compost
many items prone to producing odors such as fish wastes, produce
waste, and sewage sludge.
9) What if the clippings and brush collected for composting have been sprayed or dusted with insecticides
and herbicides?
There is no exact easy answer without knowing which pesticide
or herbicide and in what quantities are present. According to
the University of Illinois Center for Solid Waste Management
Research, some common herbicides can stay active for one full
year. Scientific research on how pesticides break down in the
compost pile is just beginning, but the consensus is that some
of these products might survive the composting process. Whether
they do or not depends on which chemical was used. Different
chemicals breakdown at different rates. Conditions within the
compost pile (heat, moisture, pH, etc.) also affect the rate
at which toxins will disappear. The composting method used will
also directly affect the breakdown rate. For example, herbicide
and insecticide molecules are more readily degraded under combined
aerobic and anaerobic conditions (found in large static pile
techniques), and the longer the time frame used (large static
pile techniques) the greater the breakdown. Composting can greatly
reduce the concentrations of these chemicals if any were present.
Many of the potentially difficult chemicals have a half-life
in a compost pile of only 3 months, hence if longer time frames
are used, these chemicals are broken down below measurable limits.
Scientists at Cornell University have monitored hundreds of
lawn and garden chemicals in compost. They found chemical residues
in compost at levels far less than that which the Food and Drug
Administration allows on food such as fruits and vegetables!
Perhaps a better way to estimate the risk of exposure to chemicals
in compost is to compare it to your neighbor who sprays their
roses with insecticides and fungicides or who uses dangerous
chemicals to treat their lawns for brown patch and chinch bugs.
Your health risk or exposure living downwind from such a neighbor
is hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of times higher than
from compost.
Additionally, compost encourages the growth of many types of
bacteria and fungus that have the ability to help detoxify many
types of pesticides, simply by using them as food. The high
humus and beneficial microbe levels found in compost are the
most important property facilitating pesticide degradation.
10) Is it correct that composting of grass and tree trimmings produces
no odor?
Yes and No. Aerobic (with oxygen) composting naturally does
not produce odor unless it is forced or speeded up. The composting
process can generate heat up to 180∞F in the compost piles
with optimum conditions occurring at 140-165∞F. This will
pasteurize the compost in the process, generally killing any
pathogens (or weed seeds) that might have been present in the
raw material. Aerobic composting is what happens on the forest
floor to the leaves and limbs that fall. It produces a dark
humus that has a sweet earthy smell. In a situation where odors
might develop the chemistry or physics of the pile is incorrect
or the process is being forced (speeded up). Normally, the gases
produced by composting are chemically similar to the gases produced
by mammals (or ammonia) and rapidly breakdown into odorless
components when they are exposed to air (oxygen). Since aerobic
composting is a environmentally friendly process, many states
only require a 200 ft. buffer from residential areas (300 ft.
in Texas). Also many communities like to have a composting facility
nearby since it is a major recycling center (30% or more of
the waste stream), and alleviates some of the need for sanitary
landfills in their area. Additionally, with many states banning
these materials from landfills (proposed for Texas also), it
reduces the illegal dumping of these wastes in neighborhoods,
subdivisions and communities.
The other type of composting is anaerobic (without oxygen).
This is what happens if green grass cuttings are placed in a
plastic bag for a few days. This can, and often does, smell
bad. Anaerobic composting is generally a slower process often
taking years to breakdown the product and is generally considered
not commercially feasible even though research is being done
in this area. This is why environmentally aware communities
use source separated collection of grass and tree trimmings.
They often require the use of special paper bags (or containers)
for their collection services which often lowers collection
costs. The paper bag (or containers) breathes hence it helps
prevent odors from occurring and the paper bag will decompose
into compost which helps ensure a clean healthy product (this
does not happen if conventional plastic bags are used). Note:
The Woods End Research Laboratory in Maine and others, have
successfully demonstrated fish waste composting, with zero odor.
11) Can sewage sludge (bio-solids) be composted?
Yes. Composting of sewage sludge can be done but the factors
involved are much more complex both from a scientific point
of view as well as governmental regulations. The potential for
foul odors are higher, the cost is higher (extra government
regulation), and the chance of pollutants in the sludge is higher.
However, with proper planning and site preparation the extra
problems can be easily overcome. Several studies have shown
that compost made with sewage sludge can be of excellent quality
and very beneficial, IF properly done. The risk in using sewage
sludge is that viruses can survive the high temperatures for
some time, and complex chemicals such as polybrominated biphenyl's
(PBB's), and heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, etc.) cannot
be easily removed from the compost. If the material entering
the sewage system is regulated at the source, preventing contamination
from occurring, then composting can be a very good solution
and long time frame composting ensures that these chemicals
are broken down. Most modern water treatment facilities, in
compliance with current regulations, produce a sewage sludge
ideal for composting. Many communities have found that co-composting
of sludge with ground brush or leaves an excellent solution
(preferred over land application or landfilling), transforming
a nasty waste disposal problem into a beneficial product. A
good example of this is the City of Austin's bio-solid composting
program which is marketed under the trade name "Dillo Dirt".
12) Is all compost the same and have the same value?
No. The type and quality of compost depends on several factors.
These include the type of source material, the composting technology
used, and the time factor in composting and ageing or curing.
Additives to the compost such as mineral or lava dust (rich
in phosphate) will reduce nitrogen loss due to ammonia. The
microbes will convert the phosphate into the exact chemical
form needed by plants. An experienced scientist can guide the
composting process to produce compost optimized for different
applications. For example, oak leaves and pine needles can be
added to a basic mixture to produce acidic compost for raising
azaleas or add seaweed to increase trace mineral content. Compost
found in the market is like any other product, it can be of
very good quality or very poor. Prices can range from $10 to
over $1,000 per cubic yard as a function of quality and market
demand.
13) How do municipal composting operations compare to
private operations?
There have been successes and failures for both types of operations.
It depends on the reasons for, and the goals of, the composting
operation. In general, private companies produce better compost,
with less problems, and at lower cost. For example, if odors
are being produced, this indicates the chemistry in the pile
is not correct. This means that thousands of dollars worth of
nutrients (nitrogen or sulfur compounds) are being lost to the
air (odors). Private companies have incentive to prevent this
from happening, since odors equal loss of profit. The financial
compensation to for a private company is based upon the profitability
of the operation hence there is a strong incentive to prevent
problems like odors. If quality compost is a goal, then most
operations are very successful.
14) What type of equipment is
required and what does it cost?
The type of equipment is dependent on the composting method,
the goals for the end product (produce profit or just reduce
landfill requirements), land constraints, available funding,
etc. Costs can range from a few hundred thousand dollars for
a very small operation to millions for a large one. Some communities
have been talked into purchasing high technology solutions (Counties
in Florida, New Jersey, Minnesota, etc.) to produce compost
from co-mingled collection and with price tags of over $40 million
dollars (many to most of these operations have been shut down).
Private companies generally use lower technology approaches
for two main reasons, economics and product quality. For example,
in regard to product quality, the use of modified static pile
technology with longer composting times (months or more) and
at high temperatures, reduces pathogens, particularly viruses
and bacteria that would not be killed in windrow methods (2-8
weeks).
The minimal equipment is some form of grinder to reduce the
source material to small sizes, a water source to wet and maintain
moisture in the material, a front end loader to turn and aerate
the compost and screening equipment to produce a final product.
If the operation is for profit (private), then there is a benefit
for larger operations to obtain the economies of scale, reducing
the unit cost.
15) Why should we compost?
There are many reasons we should compost:
- as a society are running out of landfill space. TCEQ reports
that in Texas we had 750 landfills in 1988 but only 247 remain
in operation at the start of 1994 with the numbers decreasing
each day. As landfills close the cost of garbage pickup rises.
- saves homeowners and businesses money by using a lower cost
disposal method.
- alternatives like incinerators pollute both the air and produce
hazardous waste
- composting conserves energy
- compost holds water in the soil reducing the need to water
lawns and flowerbeds
- composting benefits the environment
- composting reduces the use of dangerous chemicals in agriculture
- Texas A&M has shown that compost is an excellent product
(and the most cost effective method) for erosion control and
vegetation establishment on right-of-ways, highways and roads,
streams and bayous, and many other areas.
- Texas A&M has also found that compost used on turf grass
and lawns greatly reduces water requirements and prevents turf
grass diseases.
- if combined with clean sewage sludge, composting can solve
that disposal problem also
- prepare communities for future environmental regulations (30+
states have banned leaves, grass and tree trimmings from landfills).
- eliminates the need for peatmoss in agricultural and horticultural
applications reducing the environmental damage to wetlands in
mining peatmoss.
- regulatory agencies have recommended that grass, wood, tree
trimmings, brush, etc. be banned from Texas landfills in the
near future. When this happens, if communities do not have alternatives
(such as composting), then massive amounts of illegal dumping
or burning will occur if the pattern in other states holds true
in Texas.
- With the growing air pollution problems in the Houston area
outside burning is becoming restricted in most areas if not
banned altogether.
16) Why doesn't the State of Texas give us more time to get ready for a landfill ban?
The State of Texas first passed recycling legislation in 1989
(Senate Bills 1516, 1517 and 1519) and provided funding through
new landfill taxes to help communities develop a waste management
plan. In 1991 a new law (SB 1340) was passed recommending composting
and establishing recycling goals. This bill required communities
to recycle 40% of waste stream and compost 15%, with a deadline
of January 1, 1994. This gave communities 3 years to make the
required preparations to be in compliance. In May of 1993 (State
Senate Bill 1051) the State of Texas added financial incentives
to landfills to voluntary ban grass cuttings and other organic
wastes and provided supplemental funding (grants, etc.) for
communities to establish composting and recycling operations.
Since very few communities have taken action on establishing
composting facilities (public or private) the state will force
the issue by implementing a ban that will forbid many types
of organic wastes from entering landfills. Many states (32)
have passed various types of laws banning yard waste from landfills.
TCEQ (Texas Commission On Environmental Quality) has proposed
a landfill ban in Texas and they have been assigned the task
of enforcing the composting regulations finalized in December
1995. The Texas legislature is close to passing a landfill ban
in Texas. At the last legislative session a bill banning green
waste in landfills was drafted but did not reach the floor for
a vote before the session ended.
17) What about home composting systems?
Home composting (source reduction), if done properly, is a good
way to reduce the waste stream load and has been successful
in many communities. The reported problem, is that participation
is from a small percentage of home owners and very few businesses.
Most homeowners do not have the equipment to grind up tree trimmings
or another source of carbon materials to balance the nitrogen
in grass cuttings. Compost piles made with grass cuttings alone
have the potential to produce foul odors. Compost piles need
to be turned to aerate them and most homeowners soon tire of
this activity. If adequate moisture is not maintained, the composting
process stops and the pile can become a home to insects and
rodents. Additionally, very few home compost piles get and stay
hot long enough for maximum reduction of pathogens. Cities that
have purchased compost bins and given them (or sold them at
a nominal fee) to homeowners have had much better success. Some
of the new Vermi-composting (earthworms) systems are easy to
use and require less work, and produce extremely high quality
compost hence they are growing in popularity.
18) Why haven't I heard about compost and composting before?
The composting industry is relatively new to the United States.
Studies from the government and universities on the benefits
of compost are just beginning to make it out of the scientific
circles and into popular media such as newspapers and magazines.
According to an EPA study, there have been several thousand
composting companies started in the USA over the last 15 years.
USEFUL REFERENCES:
A non-technical overview of composting:
The Rodale Book Of COMPOSTING, Deborah L. Martin and Grace Gershuny,
Editors Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, Copyright 1992,
Published 1993.
The Secret Life of Compost, Malcolm Beck, Acres, USA Press,
Copyright 1997, Published 1996, ISBN 0-911311-53-X
Let It Rot - The Home Gardener's Guide To Composting, Stu Campbell,
Gardenway Publishing, ISBN: 0-88266-050-0A semi-technical overview
of composting:
The BioCycle Guide to THE ART & SCIENCE OF COMPOSTING, Edited
by the Staff of BioCycle Journal of Waste Recycling, The JG
Press. Inc., Emmaus, Pennsylvania, Copyright 1991, Printed Spring
1994.Technical reference on composting:
COMPOST SCIENCE & UTILIZATION, a quarterly journal, published
by the JG Press. Inc., Emmaus, Pennsylvania,
THE SCIENCE OF COMPOSTING, Eliot Epstein, PhD, 1997, Technomic
Publishing, ISBN 1-56676-478-5
COMPOST ENGINEERING (The Practical Handbook Of...), Dr. Roger
T. Haug, 1993, Lewis Publishers, ISBN 0-87371-373-7
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING OF COMPOSTING: Design, Environmental,
Microbiological and Utilization Aspects, Harry Hoitink, PhD,
Ohio State University, 1993. ISBN 0-936645-15-6 |